Jamal Crawford Named Sixth Man

Several outlets are reporting that former Knick Jamal Crawford has been named Sixth Man of the Year by a pretty healthy margin.

The holes in Jamal’s game are well-chronicled at Knickerblogger.net. Few Knicks could take fans on such an emotionally exhausting journey, from spittle-flying rage to sheer unadulterated “how did he hit that?” delight–all in one quarter–like Jamal. When he’s right, that bony, knock-kneed kid with the mild overbite has a game that is absolute poetry. When he’s not right, he’s often the last to know unfortunately. Even still, few Knicks were more likable during the dark ages.

So, congrats Jamal.

GOTME: Knicks’ General Managers

In a lottery lacking surprise,
DeBusschere drafted “The Franchise”.
But the team was a shame
Losing game after game
And from the cellar they never could rise.

Al Bianchi assembled “the Bomb Squad”
Mark Jackson, J. New, and the Hot Rod.
Traded Cartwright for Oak,
But MacLeod was a joke,
And the roster, though good, remained flawed.

Grunfeld put together some winners
Reaching the finals when league talent got thinner.
He perfected the craft
Of dodging the draft
But his teams needed “Offense for Beginners”.

Ed Tapscot was GM for a day
With a roster on the verge of decay
Instead of drafting Artest
Took the player he thought best:
A Frenchman who stayed in Marseilles.

Scott Layden had the master solution:
Trading Ewing to begin the devolution
Getting Longley and Rice,
Swapping Camby for ‘Dice
And then brilliantly maxing out Houston.

And who could forget our Isiah
At one time, a Hall of Fame playah
But as an exec
Proved an utter train wreck:
A perverted, capped-out franchise slayah.

So now there’s a savior named Donnie
Who, to undo all Isiah’d done wrong, he
Traded all of our picks
‘Till Three Thousand and Six
But still wins if he gets us LeBronie!

David Lee – Impending Buyer’s Remorse

Today’s article is by supernova. This is third place in the “Can You Be A KnickerBlogger?” Contest. As I mentioned previously, winners will receive a copy of Dave Berri’s book Stumbling on Wins.

David Lee has been the best Knick these past two seasons. Through dedication and hard work, he has raised the level of his game to make himself into a consistent double-double machine, and an All Star. In addition, to his solid offensive and rebounding statistics, he brings a consistent work ethic, so any team that ends up signing him can feel assured that even with a huge guaranteed contract they will still get a quality effort..

With that said, then why do I feel whoever ends up acquiring Lee in free agency will ultimately be disappointed?

I guess I base my concerns on watching him all these years and realizing that for all those good numbers, he never made us remotely into a winner. Yes, one player does not a team make, but he never seemed to make the team around him better, at least not appreciably. Anecdotally, he seemed to save his best for the first three quarters, but I do not remember too many occasions where he took control down the stretch of tight games.

We have all complained so much about D’Antoni’s lack of emphasis on defense. Well there was probably no bigger culprit in regards to that deficiency on the floor than David Lee (okay maybe Sergio Rodriguez). Lee in fact all but admitted that deficiency in his game a few days ago when he said that he would focus on improving his defense in the off-season. Maybe I am being a bit harsh on him here, since he was playing out of position at center and matching up against guys who were significantly taller. In terms of playing out of position, he gets a bit of a pass, but much of playing defense is speed and quickness, which Lee somewhat lacks. I do not know how at almost 27 years old, he is suddenly going to improve that part of his game. In my opinion, if it hasn’t happened already after four years in the league, it probably will not happen in this case.

Finally, should Lee soon be on a team with quality teammates his overall rebounding will probably suffer somewhat. On this past Knicks team, nobody consistently rebounded much other than Lee. His next stop will probably include a team of multiple rebounding options on the floor, and more efficient scorers (less opportunities on the offensive boards), which will both combine to reduce his total number of rebounds. In terms of scoring I believe his numbers very well could stay where they are, because although his opportunities might be limited (a team of greater and more efficient scorers), he will still make his fair share of putback chances.

Overall, I am still a big fan of David Lee’s, but a fan at the $7 million to maybe $9 million dollar level. Based on what I have been reading and hearing he will probably command somewhere in the $12-$14 million range. I will always be a big David Lee fan and I will certainly be sorry if he does leave NY, but regrettably, I would have to agree with not paying him anywhere near that level. If Donnie Walsh ends up paying him that much dough it would simply leave me with buyer’s remorse.

Knicks Draft Prospects

Today’s article is by lifelong KnickerBlogger commenter Ted Nelson. It won second place in the “Can You Be A KnickerBlogger?” Contest

The draft is an afterthought in NYC this year, between the bright lights shining on free agency and the Knicks lack of a first rounder. The Knicks do, however, have two picks early in the second round at 38 and 39. Your chances of finding a quality NBA player in the second round aren’t great, but the 2010 draft is still a legitimate chance to add talent. With only a handful of players likely to return, the Knicks need talent. (The Knicks may also choose to add a first rounder through a trade.)

While the pickings are usually slim in the 2nd round, there is still NBA talent available. Current NBA stars picked in the 2nd round include Manu Ginobili, Carlos Boozer, Mehmet Okur, Monta Ellis, Luis Scola, and Michael Redd. And there are a host of contributors of lesser stature who fell to the second. All four of last season’s conference finalists had at least one rotation player who was not taken in the first round.

There is a reason players fall to the second round, though. If they were home run draft picks they would have gone in the first. It’s often a discrepancy between a player’s performance and the scouting report on their skills. Sometimes a kid comes in as a top recruit with all the skill in the world and fails to impress, but in other cases a mediocre athlete who doesn’t even look like he could hang at the local Y tears it up in college or Europe.

Below are 18 prospects projected to go anywhere from the late first to undrafted, organized along the lines of categories that commonly bread second round success. It’s hard to predict who will be on the board when the Knicks picks come up. It’s unlikely that all of these guys will be on the board at 38, but some of them will be.

Character Questions

These guys have the skill to play in the NBA, but can they deal with the mental grind and be productive members of the team and community?

Examples: Ruben Patterson, DeAndre Jordan, Andray Blatche, Glen Davis–weight

Lance Stephenson Cincinnati 6-4/5 210 G 19
Stephenson has a big ego and doesn’t like to share the ball. However, he’s also a great athlete with good basketball skills. Watching Cincinnati-West Virginia in the Big East tournament I was pretty convinced that Stephenson was the best NBA prospect on the court… even with Da’Sean Butler and Devin Ebanks also on the court.

Stephenson has the handle of a PG and size/scoring ability of a SG. Unfortunately he doesn’t have a PG mentality and maybe not the mentality to be an efficient scorer at the 2. He can be a plus defender at either back-court spot. Ultimately the defensive side is where a lot of his value should come from. Whether he can develop the mentality necessary to be a reasonably efficient scorer within a team structure is the question.

If he’s still on the board when the Knicks pick he’s a difficult talent to pass up: by that point in the draft there are only so many guys about whom you can say “he clearly has the talent to play in the NBA.” If there are other good options on the board, though, he’s really easy to pass up. I would say that personal interviews go a long way towards judging who Lance Stephenson really is. His stock is understandably volatile and it’s not clear whether he’ll be one of the first guys taken in the second round or go undrafted.

Renardo Sidney Mississippi State 6-10 275-400 PF 20
Sidney was a big-time recruit–#1 in his class at some point–who couldn’t get on the court due to NCAA rule violations. Never mind that a bunch of old guys making millions off the labor of student-athletes like him suspended him for profiting from his ability, his lacksidasical attitude and weight gain during the suspension are legitimate causes for concern. He’s a 6-10 PF who has been compared to Chris Webber, so by the 2nd round he’s a very intriguing prospect. After taking a year off it will be interesting to see where he’s at developmentally. The whole reason for the age limit was to see how prospects would do against better competition, but with Sidney we don’t have that.

To me it’s pretty similar to Stephenson, where if there’s nothing else that intrigues you on the board take a shot if the kid shows you something in interviews/workouts. Probably even riskier than Stephenson, but he’s 6-10.


Billed as lottery picks entering college or even their final season, but didn’t live up to the hype or build on their previous season. Now they’re projected to go in the 2nd round. Can they bounce back and justify that lottery hype? Or is their slide justified?

Examples: Chase Budinger, Bill Walker, Chris Duhon

Willie Warren Oklahoma 6-4 207 G 20
Warren had a good freshman year as Blake Griffin’s side kick. The expectation was that he’d emerge from Griffin’s shadow this season and become one of the top players in the country. It didn’t happen. It’s not really that Warren played a lot worse. He just didn’t get better and the Sooners didn’t win. His TOs sky-rocketed and his very solid 3 pt shot turned into a liability. One more season might have helped him set the record straight and guarantee a first round spot. Then again, a bad season might have dropped him out of draft consideration all together.

Warren is a combo-guard who can score the ball and defend either back-court spot. Wouldn’t fill a need with Toney Douglas on the roster, but may be too good a talent for the Knicks to pass up if he’s still on the board. An NBA player.

Craig Brackins Iowa State 6-10 230 PF 22
After spending a couple of years in the lottery of mock drafts, Brackins is a consensus second rounder at this point. Brackins is a skilled offensive player with somewhat of a finesse game. His scoring and rebound volumes both took a considerable hit from his sophomore to junior seasons, as did his scoring efficiency. Has a good overall game that should allow him to play in the NBA. Has range out to the college 3 and also a somewhat of a post game. Inconsistent scorer, though. A little rare for a 6-10 guy with his scoring talent to fall to the second round, so the Knicks should take a look if he’s still on the board.


These guys were productive college stars, but scouts have questions about whether their game will translate to the NBA. Historically these guys are the inverse to the Adam Morrison, Shelden Williams types who have failed to match their college productivity in the pros after being drafted high: the Josh Howard, Tayshaun Prince, Carlos Boozer types who fell in the draft but proved their doubters wrong with successful pro careers.

In a sense this is the best bet for a successful second round draft pick–the guy can play, but scouts don’t seem to realize it. The problem is figuring out which player has the skills but is being underrated. It looks obvious in hindsight, but is often a lot harder at the time.

Examples: DeJuan Blair, Carl Landry, Mario Chalmers, Marc Gasol, Paul Millsap, Ryan Gomes, Steve Blake

Greivis Vasquez Maryland 6-5 195 G 23
ACC Players of the Year have enjoyed a fair amount of NBA success. The award guaranteed nothing for Julius Hodge, Juan Dixon, Joseph Forte, or Chris Carrawell, though. Vasquez had a strong overall game at the college level, but you have to question which parts will translate to the NBA. He’s a combo-guard who is unlikely to walk into the league as a PG and he may lack either the shot or the athleticism to be much of a scorer at the NBA level. The optimistic view is that he’s a 6-6 combo-guard who can play the one or the two in the NBA, the negative view is that he’ll be a star… in Europe. Knicks could do worse by the 38th pick: he wants it and he can play.

Da’Sean Butler West Virginia 6-7 225 SF 22
Butler was a first round lock before injuring his knee in the national championship game. Well rounded game. Solid scorer, though a little high-volume/low-efficiency in college. Can score multiple ways. Good ball-handler and playmaker. Good defender. If his scoring doesn’t translate to the NBA does he bring enough to the table to be an NBA player?

Quincy Pondexter Washington 6-6/7 215 SF 22
Questionable whether he’ll fall to the Knicks pick. A strong all-around wing prospect. A polished college player who is going to bring a little bit of everything. Question is his upside and whether he brings enough of any one thing. Questions also about how he will transition from the college 4 to the NBA 3. (There were similar questions about a guy like Josh Howard.)

Sherron Collins Kansas 5-11? 190 PG 23
Collins is one of the best college guards in the draft. He’s an undersized bowling ball who may not have much NBA success, though. I think the comparisons to Will Bynum seem fair, as he lacks the other-worldy athleticism of Nate Robinson. Collins is a flat out basketball player who will probably have a very successful pro career in Europe if he fails to make it in the NBA.

Jordan Crawford Xavier 6-4 195 SG 21
You have to question whether he can adjust to being a complementary scorer after having the ball in his hands all the time at Xavier: he lacks great finishing ability but does have a strong outside shot. If he adjusts he should be a solid NBA off-guard. He has a very good handle and is a solid playmaker at the 2. Should be able to hold his own defensively, though he’s unlikely to be a plus defender. Not really undersized, but size is also not a plus. May be gone by the time the Knicks pick.

Unexpected Faller

It’s impossible to say who this will be at this point, because in that case it would be expected. There are usually some guys in the draft that everyone and their mother think should go earlier but just keep falling. Consensus doesn’t always mean success in the NBA draft, but sometimes teams pass on no-brainers (DeJuan Blair being one of the most obvious examples in history). This years early candidate is Da’Sean Butler, who I thought was getting a little too hyped but has now fallen to the late second in mock drafts after injuring his knee in the national championship game. Armon Johnson is an intriguing guy who may fall to the Knicks.

Examples: DeJuan Blair

Big Bodies

Size is at a premium in the NBA, and the draft is often the best way to get it. Once teams have a strong bigman on their roster they usually lock him up. The draft is a chance to get first dibs on a big guy. By the 2nd round you’re looking for a diamond in the rough, a specialist, or a grit guy. This is a deep draft for bigmen, though, compared to last seasons vertically challenged draft class.

Undersized bigs (6-6 PFs) tend to be really underrated and there is one success story almost every year. This year a lot of talented guys in the 2nd have legit size, though.

Examples: DeAndre Jordan, Marc Gasol, Nick Fazekas!, Paul Millsap, Leon Powe, Ronny Turiaf, Andray Blatche, Amir Johnson, Anderson Varejao, Matt Bonner, Boozer, Scola…

Daniel Orton Kentucky 6-10 260 F/C 19
Orton unexpectedly declared for the draft after riding the pine behind Cousins and Patterson all season. With little NCAA experience to go on, it’s not clear whether he’ll go in the lottery or fall to the second round. Orton has great size for the PF spot, solid size at C. Has a strong all-around game as a rebounder and defender. He didn’t show much scoring ability at Kentucky, but has the makings of a well-rounded offensive game for a F/C. It’s a little odd he didn’t spend another season at Kentucky and propel himself into the lottery. If he falls all the way to the Knicks I’d say his upside is worth the risk.

Jarvis Varnado Mississippi State 6-9 210 F/C 22
Already a fan favorite at Knickerblogger, Varnado is the kind of shot-blocker the team could use. A good athlete who could fit in as a 5 for D’Antoni because he gets up and down the floor well. May get pushed around at the 5, though, especially early in his career. Also a strong rebounder. Efficient scorer around the basket. A lowish case scenario is maybe Steven Hunter, who played some of his best NBA ball for D’Antoni in Phoenix. Upside has been compared to Theo Ratliff. I would consider the Knicks lucky if Varnado falls to them. As Knicks fans we know how valuable it is to have some interior defense.

Solomon Alabi Florida State 7-1 251 C 22
I somehow don’t see a seven footer who was a bigtime recruit falling to the second round, but that’s where he is in some mocks. Others have him in the early 20s. I wouldn’t be surprised if a team takes him in the 20s as a project. Alabi has the tools to be a very good defensive C. He is raw, though, and there’s a chance he’s still on the board when the Knicks pick. With back-to-back picks it’s hard to pass him up in the late 30s. Hopefully D’Antoni’s reluctance to play 5s doesn’t factor into the decision.

Dexter Pittman Texas 6-10 310 C 22
Truly a BIG body. Pittman is a skilled inside scorer, but has trouble staying on the court for more than a couple of minutes at a time (literally). And that’s a big improvement in his conditioning since his freshman year. I didn’t include him in character issues since he clearly wants to improve and be a team player, it’s just a matter of whether he is physically able to. He might find his way into an NBA rotation as a 4th bigman in a role similar to the one Glen “uno-uno” Davis plays for the Celtics (and he’d probably manage to score a lot more efficiently than the player formerly known as Big Baby).

The Euro Route

This is a popular route with second round draft picks since teams can watch how the prospect develops while still holding their draft rights. Things have changed since the days when Manu fell to the 2nd to last pick in the draft, and top young talents rarely go unnoticed. However, it’s still possible to find a promising young kid and watch him develop. In a lot of cases this is actually preferable to taking a European in the late first, where the salary a team can offer is not competitive with what European teams can.

Examples: Ginobili, Scola, Okur, Marc Gasol, Ersan Ilyasova, Varejao, Goran Dragic, Marcin Gortat.

Kevin Seraphin France 6-10 255 F/C 20
One of the most intriguing international prospects in this draft, Seraphin is a big-time athlete as well as a big-time project. The 20 year old is probably someone you want to leave in Europe for a couple of years. That might not appeal to the Knicks, who have a lot of holes on their roster now. Seraphin could end up being a perfect bigman for D’Antoni: a big athlete who excels on the pick-and-role and finishing at the basket. Plays for the same team as 2009 draftees Rodrigue Beaubois and Nando de Colo. Got decent playing time for a 20 year old and got better as the season went on. The type of high upside guy who could develop into a star or could never make it to the NBA.

Pablo Aguilar Spain 6-8 210 PF 21
Doesn’t have the highest upside in the world, but a productive player at a young age. Plays in the toughest domestic league in Europe and is one of the best player on a borderline playoff team. Came up with Real Madrid before being transfered. A face-up 4 with a good outside shot. Downside is that he’s a total ‘tweener. With the success he’s had in the ACB at a young age he’s likely to continue to improve and become a star in Europe. It’s a question whether he’ll even improve enough to be an NBA rotation player. Probably a specialist who will have more success in certain situations and for certain coaches: i.e. a PF who doesn’t rebound or score inside the 3 pt line. Comparable to Jorge Garbajosa.

Nemanja Bjelica Serbia 6-10 210 G/F almost 22
Described as a PG trapped in a PF’s body by draftexpress.com. Sounds like a project with a long way to go, but apparently opinions vary widely on him. Certainly has strong upside. At 22 he better start getting a lot closer to that upside soon.

Miroslav Raduljica Serbia 6-11 240 C 22
A legit center prospect with a good offensive game. You have to think his potential is somewhat limited or he’d be a lot more hyped. Could be a diamond in the rough, though.

Alexey Shved Russia (CSKA Moscow) 6-5 161 G 21
Talented player with good upside, but a raw project right now. Plays for one of the best teams in Europe, CSKA Moscow. Doesn’t get on the court much. A wait and see prospect who could develop into a star in Russia and then make the jump to the NBA.


Some other typical second round success categories that I’m not sure about 2010 examples for are the hustle defender (Luc Mbah a Moute, Trevor Ariza, Keith Bogans, Amir Johnson) or the guy who came out too early (Trevor Ariza, Monta Ellis, Louis Williams, Mo Williams, Andray Blatche). The second category especially depends on draft position.

Birth Of A Knick Fan For Life

Today’s article is by Lee Davis, director of the films 3AM and Hoop Realities and life-long Knick fan. Lee won first prize in the “Can You Be A KnickerBlogger?” for this contribution.

I was about eight years old, strolling through midtown holding my fathers hand when we both turned towards the sound of screams. A man plummeted past the side of a building, landing with a thud behind the row of parked cars along the curb. My dad was shaken up. Me? I wanted to get a look at what was left of the guy.

Minutes later we stood in front of the Penn Hotel, just across the street from The Garden. Beside us, waiting for the light to change, was Clyde Frazier, complete with flowing trench-coat and hat. I was in awe. Superhero music played in my head. My Dad smiled, said a coupla words to him, and Clyde reached down and shook my hand with a grin.

Birth of a Knick fan for life. Recently I wonder if maybe it had less to do with meeting Clyde than with the incident that occurred earlier that day. Maybe it was more my own inner fascination with the grotesque. Deep down there is something about a train wreck that captures the curiosity — a need to see how bad it really looks. Maybe thats why the Garden still has so many sell-outs.

Knick fans like myself are hoping for Christmas in July. Ignoring the pundits who speculate one way or the other, I am content to wait. I want LeBron. I want to keep David Lee. But like a magic trick, I think the real action is where the audience is not looking. My eyes are on a deal for Ricky Rubio. D’Antoni needs a player to push the pedal to the metal. Donnie Walsh knows that on Broadway you need characters — with character. Clyde, Bradley, DeBusschere, Reed. It is about winning, yes, but the true goal is to forge a team identity. An aura. A feeling that fans want to be a part of.

Imagine the mop-headed Rubio in a Knick jersey throwing alley-oops to LeBron, or no-look passes to Gallo from three. Lebron encouraging his teammates to believe in each other. Wilson Chandler emerging as the star they keep pleading with him to be.

Suddenly the Mecca of Basketball really is again.

An uptempo team offense is not a cover for poor defense. But a few blowout victories, buoyed by a quick start in exhibition on an international stage, and suddenly D’Antoni is the Coach he really thinks he is, and everyone else is wrong, that is at least until the playoffs.

Hoping for the best here. Hoping for the third seed next year.

Not that it matters. Either way they know we’ll be watching.Even if they acquire no players of significance, and let David Lee walk. We’ll watch. We can’t help it.

We’ll be that eight year old, struggling to get a clear look at the damage.

Refs Partly To Blame For Garnett Suspension

I watched the Game 1 of the Celtics-Heat series at my local bar, and happened to catch Garnett’s elbow live. At the time I turned to my wife and mentioned that he’ll be suspended for the next game. I also had to explain to her who Quentin Richardson was, how important Garnett was to the Celtics, and how the league will review the tape to issue the suspension. Today the league has announced that Garnett won’t be allowed to play in Game 2, which really isn’t much of a surprise to anyone. However there is one other thing that I noted to my wife. Garnett’s suspension is partially the fault of the referees.

I’m not saying that I condone K.G.’s actions, and I think the league did the (obviously) right thing. However, I think should the front offices rewind the tape a little further, they’ll find something that contributed to the melee. Watch this clip, that shows the action on the court right before the melee began. Pierce and Garnett execute the pick & roll while the Heat switch and Udonis Haslem is responsible for guarding Pierce. Haslem’s defensive technique is perfect… for an NFL cornerback bumping a WR off the line of scrimmage. The Heat defender gets his hands into Pierce’s midsection and gives him a hip check altering Pierce’s trajectory.

Haslem’s actions are a clear foul in the NBA, yet the referees failed to make the call. The NBA’s philosophy seems to be to allow the players, not the officials, decide the outcome of the game. By allowing the zebras to swallow their whistles in the most critical moments, the refs actually alter the course of the game much more than if they called it uniformly. In this case allowing for such rough play directly led to Pierce lying prone off the floor. Had the refs made the correct decision and called the foul at the proper moment, Pierce doesn’t end up on the sidelines and Garnett doesn’t throw a frustrated elbow at Richardson.

Physical contact is a part of the game, and getting a foul called on the opponent vindicates the players’ action and allows for them to, for lack of a better term, vent some steam. You can see this by viewing how angry some players get when they feel they were fouled and no call was made. The league did the proper thing by suspending Garnett, but they still have some unfinished business. Referees should be blind to regards of score, location, player, or time. Games should be officiated using the same criteria whether it be the first minute or the last.