<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Report Card: Mike D&#8217;Antoni</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbaked</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291113</link>
		<dc:creator>gbaked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like Mike D didnt care much about winning this season.

I think he played the guys that worked hard in practice. That showed they wanted to be part of the team... and to hell with everyone else.

I was all for the nate benching. I have a feeling there is WAY more that happened behind the scenes then we know. I always felt that something happened on the bus, or in the locker room and Nate was punished. 

These are things that will help the young guys. Tony D, Gallo, and IllWil know that they need to work hard and play for the team to play. It wont matter who is paid the most, but rather who wants to be on the team that will garner playing time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like Mike D didnt care much about winning this season.</p>
<p>I think he played the guys that worked hard in practice. That showed they wanted to be part of the team&#8230; and to hell with everyone else.</p>
<p>I was all for the nate benching. I have a feeling there is WAY more that happened behind the scenes then we know. I always felt that something happened on the bus, or in the locker room and Nate was punished. </p>
<p>These are things that will help the young guys. Tony D, Gallo, and IllWil know that they need to work hard and play for the team to play. It wont matter who is paid the most, but rather who wants to be on the team that will garner playing time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schajua</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291091</link>
		<dc:creator>schajua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a rant that I&#039;ve been suppressing for two years.  The opportunity to reflect on Mike D&#039;Atoni&#039;s wrecthed coaching combined with the absurdity of trading a promising player like Wilson Chandler for another defensive liability like Ruby Fernandez, who on a good team would challenge Danilo Gallanari for the 7-8th man role position has pushed me over the edge.

First, the F grade for D&#039;Antoni seems right, for all the reasons Mike Kurylo stated, though a clear headed analysis of his over valuing of Gallo could easily drop his rating to an F-.  Gallo is a 7th man on a decent team, a 12-15 minute guy at best.  He has heart but only one skill, shooting an uncontested spot-up three.  Though advertised as a Tony Kukoc type of creator, he doesn&#039;t have clearly lacks the quickness, vision, and passing skills to justify that comparison. The excessive playing time Gallo received accounts most for the poor rebounding and contributed massively to the poor defense. Gallo hustles, is tough and willing but simply lacks the athleticism and anticipatory skills to be a good defender.  The truth is that Gallo is a tweener--not strong enough to guard PF on the block and two slow to guard either stretch PF and SF on the perimeter.  In other words, defensive liability.

It&#039;s amazing that in Gallo&#039;s defense folks point to his chronological age.  What&#039;s important is not his twenty-one years of age, but his years as a professional basketball player. He played a few years for junior squads and 2-3 years at the professional level before joining the Knicks.  He is only a few months younger than Wilson Chandler but has been a professional player maybe 2-3 more years.  From my perspective, Chandler is not only by far the more talented basketball player, but given their ages and professional experience also has the most upside.

Are the Knicks determined to become the first Euroleague team in the NBA? Move up to draft Greivis Vazquez? Trade Chandler for Rudy Fernandez?  Neither of those guys would ever start or be a productive sixth man on a decent NBA team. Fernandez can score but would give it and more back on the defensive end.  It&#039;s this type of strategy that will cost the Knick LBJ.  Because Bosh wants to be the Man, we may have a chance to get him, but other than that ego driven desire, what sane max-level player would want to join a team that&#039;s building for the Euroleague championship. This is clearly MD&#039;s plan.

 Surely it&#039;s not Donnie Walsh&#039;s.  

Perhaps after the free debacle, they will eat MD&#039;s contact and hire a coach that committed to competing in the NBA, not the Euroleague.

The point guard the Knicks need is Shawn Livingston.  He available for a portion of the mid-level exemption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rant that I&#8217;ve been suppressing for two years.  The opportunity to reflect on Mike D&#8217;Atoni&#8217;s wrecthed coaching combined with the absurdity of trading a promising player like Wilson Chandler for another defensive liability like Ruby Fernandez, who on a good team would challenge Danilo Gallanari for the 7-8th man role position has pushed me over the edge.</p>
<p>First, the F grade for D&#8217;Antoni seems right, for all the reasons Mike Kurylo stated, though a clear headed analysis of his over valuing of Gallo could easily drop his rating to an F-.  Gallo is a 7th man on a decent team, a 12-15 minute guy at best.  He has heart but only one skill, shooting an uncontested spot-up three.  Though advertised as a Tony Kukoc type of creator, he doesn&#8217;t have clearly lacks the quickness, vision, and passing skills to justify that comparison. The excessive playing time Gallo received accounts most for the poor rebounding and contributed massively to the poor defense. Gallo hustles, is tough and willing but simply lacks the athleticism and anticipatory skills to be a good defender.  The truth is that Gallo is a tweener&#8211;not strong enough to guard PF on the block and two slow to guard either stretch PF and SF on the perimeter.  In other words, defensive liability.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing that in Gallo&#8217;s defense folks point to his chronological age.  What&#8217;s important is not his twenty-one years of age, but his years as a professional basketball player. He played a few years for junior squads and 2-3 years at the professional level before joining the Knicks.  He is only a few months younger than Wilson Chandler but has been a professional player maybe 2-3 more years.  From my perspective, Chandler is not only by far the more talented basketball player, but given their ages and professional experience also has the most upside.</p>
<p>Are the Knicks determined to become the first Euroleague team in the NBA? Move up to draft Greivis Vazquez? Trade Chandler for Rudy Fernandez?  Neither of those guys would ever start or be a productive sixth man on a decent NBA team. Fernandez can score but would give it and more back on the defensive end.  It&#8217;s this type of strategy that will cost the Knick LBJ.  Because Bosh wants to be the Man, we may have a chance to get him, but other than that ego driven desire, what sane max-level player would want to join a team that&#8217;s building for the Euroleague championship. This is clearly MD&#8217;s plan.</p>
<p> Surely it&#8217;s not Donnie Walsh&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>Perhaps after the free debacle, they will eat MD&#8217;s contact and hire a coach that committed to competing in the NBA, not the Euroleague.</p>
<p>The point guard the Knicks need is Shawn Livingston.  He available for a portion of the mid-level exemption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massive</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291071</link>
		<dc:creator>massive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted,

You have a point about Fernandez being able to help out Douglas handle and distribute. My point was on defense, I&#039;m not sure he&#039;s capable of guarding the point. I once heard somebody compare Fernandez to Ginobili. I&#039;m positive he can&#039;t defend like him, but I do agree that he shouldn&#039;t have a problem playing in (not boring) New York, in (a not boring) D&#039;Antoni&#039;s system where he&#039;ll be a bigger part of the offense (Roy, Webster, Batum, and Bayless played at the 2 and 3 along with Fernandez. In New York, he&#039;d be sharing floor time with Walker, Gallo, and hopefully LeBron/Wade). The whole point was trading Douglas for Fernandez wouldn&#039;t be too smart defensively. I&#039;m sure Fernandez and Douglas would work out fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>You have a point about Fernandez being able to help out Douglas handle and distribute. My point was on defense, I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;s capable of guarding the point. I once heard somebody compare Fernandez to Ginobili. I&#8217;m positive he can&#8217;t defend like him, but I do agree that he shouldn&#8217;t have a problem playing in (not boring) New York, in (a not boring) D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s system where he&#8217;ll be a bigger part of the offense (Roy, Webster, Batum, and Bayless played at the 2 and 3 along with Fernandez. In New York, he&#8217;d be sharing floor time with Walker, Gallo, and hopefully LeBron/Wade). The whole point was trading Douglas for Fernandez wouldn&#8217;t be too smart defensively. I&#8217;m sure Fernandez and Douglas would work out fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291064</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@74/75

Why is Chandler more valuable? I&#039;d say the opposite. Rudy has been more productive, has a less common skill set, actually finishes extremely well just rarely ever goes to the basket, and has an extra year at rookie scale.

I also don&#039;t see why Portland would want WC. 

@80

I don&#039;t think Rudy can play PG, but he wouldn&#039;t be the worst guy to help take some ball handling/playmaking pressure off Douglas (also not the best).

Bill Waker has like 200 minutes of NBA action, huge holes in his game, and a history of knee problems... I don&#039;t think he&#039;s getting you Rudy and a 2nd... More like just a 2nd. (Portland&#039;s owner, Paul Allen, was Bill Gates&#039; partner and is one of the richest men in the world... Cash is not a big motivator for their franchise: they just paid $2 mill to move up 10 spots in the 2nd round and have been buying picks for years...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@74/75</p>
<p>Why is Chandler more valuable? I&#8217;d say the opposite. Rudy has been more productive, has a less common skill set, actually finishes extremely well just rarely ever goes to the basket, and has an extra year at rookie scale.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see why Portland would want WC. </p>
<p>@80</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Rudy can play PG, but he wouldn&#8217;t be the worst guy to help take some ball handling/playmaking pressure off Douglas (also not the best).</p>
<p>Bill Waker has like 200 minutes of NBA action, huge holes in his game, and a history of knee problems&#8230; I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s getting you Rudy and a 2nd&#8230; More like just a 2nd. (Portland&#8217;s owner, Paul Allen, was Bill Gates&#8217; partner and is one of the richest men in the world&#8230; Cash is not a big motivator for their franchise: they just paid $2 mill to move up 10 spots in the 2nd round and have been buying picks for years&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massive</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291062</link>
		<dc:creator>massive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About this Will for Rudy deal, maybe Will can get us more (Bayless?). Rudy is likely to be dynamite in our system, and Chandler should excell in Portland too. I&#039;d rather give them Bill Walker and cash for Fernandez and a 2nd round pick, but life isn&#039;t always like that. I hope they don&#039;t get Toney though, ESPN is saying Fernandez would play the point. I&#039;ll have nightmare of Rajon Rondo of lighting us up for 45 points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About this Will for Rudy deal, maybe Will can get us more (Bayless?). Rudy is likely to be dynamite in our system, and Chandler should excell in Portland too. I&#8217;d rather give them Bill Walker and cash for Fernandez and a 2nd round pick, but life isn&#8217;t always like that. I hope they don&#8217;t get Toney though, ESPN is saying Fernandez would play the point. I&#8217;ll have nightmare of Rajon Rondo of lighting us up for 45 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loathing</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291061</link>
		<dc:creator>Loathing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW, ran the proposed deal through the trade machine (Chandler/Fernandez)...machine sez Blazers get the better end of the deal, so make that a &quot;NO&quot; for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, ran the proposed deal through the trade machine (Chandler/Fernandez)&#8230;machine sez Blazers get the better end of the deal, so make that a &#8220;NO&#8221; for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loathing</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291060</link>
		<dc:creator>Loathing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Caleb:

Was: Bron, Arenas, Wall, and...Blatche?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Caleb:</p>
<p>Was: Bron, Arenas, Wall, and&#8230;Blatche?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291059</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chandler and Fernandez are pretty close as prospects; it&#039;s nice that Chandler is two years younger BUT - Fernandez has an extra year on his rookie contract, meaning an extra $3-4 million in cap space for the Knicks next summer..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chandler and Fernandez are pretty close as prospects; it&#8217;s nice that Chandler is two years younger BUT &#8211; Fernandez has an extra year on his rookie contract, meaning an extra $3-4 million in cap space for the Knicks next summer..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massive</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291058</link>
		<dc:creator>massive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If LeBron wants to go down as the greatest player EVER, he doesn&#039;t go to Chicago or Miami. In Chicago, he&#039;ll have to win 7 championships in order to be crowned immortal, a bit much to ask. In Miami with Wade, he&#039;ll be sharing the glory, and LeBron/Wade will be the best 1-2 punch in history, and that he needed Wade to cement his legacy. Neither option is good for his legacy, or at least not as good as New York, the Clippers (hey, winning here would be monumental), or Cleveland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If LeBron wants to go down as the greatest player EVER, he doesn&#8217;t go to Chicago or Miami. In Chicago, he&#8217;ll have to win 7 championships in order to be crowned immortal, a bit much to ask. In Miami with Wade, he&#8217;ll be sharing the glory, and LeBron/Wade will be the best 1-2 punch in history, and that he needed Wade to cement his legacy. Neither option is good for his legacy, or at least not as good as New York, the Clippers (hey, winning here would be monumental), or Cleveland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeeWhyDee77</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2010-report-card-mike-dantoni/#comment-291057</link>
		<dc:creator>SeeWhyDee77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=3806#comment-291057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, I don&#039;t see why Portland would do a Chandler for Fernandez trade with Batum and Webster platoonin at the 3. Furthermore, I would think walsh wouldn&#039;t do it either if the deal really is Chandler and a 2nd for Rudy. All for a million dollars? To me Wil is more valuable than Rudy. He doesn&#039;t stretch the floor like Rudy, but he&#039;s definitely better and worth more than Rudy straight up. If they want Wil and our 2nd rounder that bad then I would suggests Walsh asks for that #22 in the draft as well. Wil&#039;s not a world beater, but he&#039;s been a main contributor for us these past 2 seasons and hasn&#039;t regressed. I think we can get a better deal for Wil..and I do like Rudy..just not for Wil and a 2nd rounder-not even for Wil straight up becuz though Rudy makes our backcourt more..flexible? We need Wil rite now more than we need Rudy. Wil boards and plays tough D. Or i&#039;d even accept Wil for Rudy and their 2nd rounder..I hope i&#039;m not putting too much value on Wil..I just don&#039;t want Walsh to sell him short and we end up losing more than we gain just like the JJ trade (the jury is still out on the trade of course until we sign some franchise changers with the cap space). But it is interesting tho]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I don&#8217;t see why Portland would do a Chandler for Fernandez trade with Batum and Webster platoonin at the 3. Furthermore, I would think walsh wouldn&#8217;t do it either if the deal really is Chandler and a 2nd for Rudy. All for a million dollars? To me Wil is more valuable than Rudy. He doesn&#8217;t stretch the floor like Rudy, but he&#8217;s definitely better and worth more than Rudy straight up. If they want Wil and our 2nd rounder that bad then I would suggests Walsh asks for that #22 in the draft as well. Wil&#8217;s not a world beater, but he&#8217;s been a main contributor for us these past 2 seasons and hasn&#8217;t regressed. I think we can get a better deal for Wil..and I do like Rudy..just not for Wil and a 2nd rounder-not even for Wil straight up becuz though Rudy makes our backcourt more..flexible? We need Wil rite now more than we need Rudy. Wil boards and plays tough D. Or i&#8217;d even accept Wil for Rudy and their 2nd rounder..I hope i&#8217;m not putting too much value on Wil..I just don&#8217;t want Walsh to sell him short and we end up losing more than we gain just like the JJ trade (the jury is still out on the trade of course until we sign some franchise changers with the cap space). But it is interesting tho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
