<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008-9 Game Thread: Knicks vs Wizards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271991</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Bow,

Interesting idea. A couple of things that come to mind are 1) the Mavs have a lot of depth at F (Dirk, Howard, Bass, Gerald Green, Shawne Williams, Antoine Wright, Devean George, and James Singleton... maybe a 3-way deal works or the Mavs feel like they need a defensive upgrade over those guys) and 2) the way Jeffries has played the last two seasons it&#039;s not clear he&#039;s an upgrade over an aging Stackhouse. I suppose the second reason is why everyone is anxious for Jeffries to get into the lineup and make an impact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Bow,</p>
<p>Interesting idea. A couple of things that come to mind are 1) the Mavs have a lot of depth at F (Dirk, Howard, Bass, Gerald Green, Shawne Williams, Antoine Wright, Devean George, and James Singleton&#8230; maybe a 3-way deal works or the Mavs feel like they need a defensive upgrade over those guys) and 2) the way Jeffries has played the last two seasons it&#8217;s not clear he&#8217;s an upgrade over an aging Stackhouse. I suppose the second reason is why everyone is anxious for Jeffries to get into the lineup and make an impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben bow</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271966</link>
		<dc:creator>ben bow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey can someone please tell me what they think of this trade? once jeffries gets back, and hes playing decent hopefully, i think we should trade him to dallas for Stackhouse straight up. they aren&#039;t playing Stack at all, and they seem like they are going for it since they traded  Harris for Kidd. Anyone who might provide has to be better than a nobody on your bench. Stackhouse has a little higher contract, but its only 2 years, and then we&#039;d have another contract off the books by 2010.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey can someone please tell me what they think of this trade? once jeffries gets back, and hes playing decent hopefully, i think we should trade him to dallas for Stackhouse straight up. they aren&#8217;t playing Stack at all, and they seem like they are going for it since they traded  Harris for Kidd. Anyone who might provide has to be better than a nobody on your bench. Stackhouse has a little higher contract, but its only 2 years, and then we&#8217;d have another contract off the books by 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271932</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m interested to see how Jeffries is used.”

The only thing with Jeffries that I am interested in seeing is whether other teams would want him&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Yes, it goes without saying that the biggest contribution he could make is going away to another team, for a shorter salary. If he looks good in the meantime, those odds go up (from zero, as of now).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m interested to see how Jeffries is used.”</p>
<p>The only thing with Jeffries that I am interested in seeing is whether other teams would want him</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, it goes without saying that the biggest contribution he could make is going away to another team, for a shorter salary. If he looks good in the meantime, those odds go up (from zero, as of now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271922</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’m interested to see how Jeffries is used.&quot;

The only thing with Jeffries that I am interested in seeing is whether other teams would want him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m interested to see how Jeffries is used.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only thing with Jeffries that I am interested in seeing is whether other teams would want him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271918</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, besides his long arms (which are an amazing asset), what I like best about Jeffries is that he does really seem to have a great head for the game. If only he had more talent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, besides his long arms (which are an amazing asset), what I like best about Jeffries is that he does really seem to have a great head for the game. If only he had more talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271916</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffries&#039; b-ball IQ should make him somewhat useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffries&#8217; b-ball IQ should make him somewhat useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271915</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m interested to see how Jeffries is used. He&#039;s a weak rebounder (just average, even for a small forward), a terrible shooter and too skinny to keep centers from getting position. 

BUT - he&#039;s pretty low on turnovers, a decent passer, doesn&#039;t shoot much, works hard, moves well for a 6&#039;11 guy (he&#039;s a legit small forward) and has those long, long arms. Whatever the reason, he&#039;s had a good plus-minus rating the last couple of years (partly, IMO, because he would come in when Curry sat). 

IMO he was totally unsuited to Isiah&#039;s half-court game; he was much better in Washington where they had a trapping defense (where he could break up passing lanes) and fast-break offense (since he can&#039;t hit a jumper to save his life). D&#039;Antoni does a great job putting players in position to succeed -- showcasing strengths and camouflaging weaknesses - so I&#039;m cautiously optimistic that Jeffries will be a positive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested to see how Jeffries is used. He&#8217;s a weak rebounder (just average, even for a small forward), a terrible shooter and too skinny to keep centers from getting position. </p>
<p>BUT &#8211; he&#8217;s pretty low on turnovers, a decent passer, doesn&#8217;t shoot much, works hard, moves well for a 6&#8217;11 guy (he&#8217;s a legit small forward) and has those long, long arms. Whatever the reason, he&#8217;s had a good plus-minus rating the last couple of years (partly, IMO, because he would come in when Curry sat). </p>
<p>IMO he was totally unsuited to Isiah&#8217;s half-court game; he was much better in Washington where they had a trapping defense (where he could break up passing lanes) and fast-break offense (since he can&#8217;t hit a jumper to save his life). D&#8217;Antoni does a great job putting players in position to succeed &#8212; showcasing strengths and camouflaging weaknesses &#8211; so I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic that Jeffries will be a positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o_boogie</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271911</link>
		<dc:creator>o_boogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Rose may have seen his last PT of the season.&quot;

Hallelujah.  

Nice rotation analysis, Caleb.  I&#039;d like to see Gallinari get healthy and start taking 15-20 a game around Feb-March when we go into full-blown tank mode.  As for Jeffries, it will definitely be interesting to see what he brings to the table once he is back.  Unfortunately, his career average is .4 bpg, so our blocked shots problem probably won&#039;t be solved.  However, I do like the idea of having someone big who can rebound and is a good enough ball handler to rebound and initate the break.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rose may have seen his last PT of the season.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hallelujah.  </p>
<p>Nice rotation analysis, Caleb.  I&#8217;d like to see Gallinari get healthy and start taking 15-20 a game around Feb-March when we go into full-blown tank mode.  As for Jeffries, it will definitely be interesting to see what he brings to the table once he is back.  Unfortunately, his career average is .4 bpg, so our blocked shots problem probably won&#8217;t be solved.  However, I do like the idea of having someone big who can rebound and is a good enough ball handler to rebound and initate the break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271910</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see 10 viable players on the roster right now -- and one of them, Curry, is out for an injury or being fat, whatever it is. 

Barring injury, it&#039;s a good bet the rotation will include Lee, Jeffries, Harrington, Chandler, Robinson and Duhon. (Jeffries ain&#039;t great, but he brings something different from the other frontcourt players -- a defensive specialist who doesn&#039;t need the ball). Q will play as long as he&#039;s healthy. (it&#039;s been every other year, right?) Mobley and Thomas could both play. Mobley is pretty spent, but I guess we are thinner in the backcourt, which bodes well for his chances.  

If Curry ever gets in shape, or needs to be showcased for a trade, he would probably replace one of those two in the rotation. But of the front 9, at least one will usually be injured - just the odds. 

Roberson might play if Mobley falls on his face, but IMO he looks like roster-filler. 

With two forwards and Jeffries in the mix, Rose may have seen his last PT of the season. James, Marbury and Gallinari flesh out the 15...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see 10 viable players on the roster right now &#8212; and one of them, Curry, is out for an injury or being fat, whatever it is. </p>
<p>Barring injury, it&#8217;s a good bet the rotation will include Lee, Jeffries, Harrington, Chandler, Robinson and Duhon. (Jeffries ain&#8217;t great, but he brings something different from the other frontcourt players &#8212; a defensive specialist who doesn&#8217;t need the ball). Q will play as long as he&#8217;s healthy. (it&#8217;s been every other year, right?) Mobley and Thomas could both play. Mobley is pretty spent, but I guess we are thinner in the backcourt, which bodes well for his chances.  </p>
<p>If Curry ever gets in shape, or needs to be showcased for a trade, he would probably replace one of those two in the rotation. But of the front 9, at least one will usually be injured &#8211; just the odds. </p>
<p>Roberson might play if Mobley falls on his face, but IMO he looks like roster-filler. </p>
<p>With two forwards and Jeffries in the mix, Rose may have seen his last PT of the season. James, Marbury and Gallinari flesh out the 15&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2008-9-game-thread-knicks-vs-wizards/#comment-271908</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1077#comment-271908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does every proposed lineup have Lee coming off the bench? With Randolph and Chandler gone, is there any debate that he&#039;s the best guy left on the roster?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does every proposed lineup have Lee coming off the bench? With Randolph and Chandler gone, is there any debate that he&#8217;s the best guy left on the roster?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
